Senate Candidate Dave McCormick Led Hedge Fund that Bet Against Some of Pennsylvania’s Most Iconic Companies

163

Senate Candidate Dave McCormick Led Hedge Fund that Bet Against Some of Pennsylvania’s Most Iconic Companies

Introduction

Pennsylvania’s Senate race has taken on a new level of intrigue with Republican candidate Dave McCormick facing scrutiny over his past leadership of Bridgewater Associates, one of the world’s largest hedge funds. During McCormick’s tenure, the firm made some controversial investment decisions, including betting against iconic Pennsylvania companies like The Hershey Company and US Steel. As McCormick campaigns on being a job creator and champion for Pennsylvania workers, his past as a financial leader could become a significant hurdle.

Who is Dave McCormick?

Dave McCormick is no stranger to the spotlight. A West Point graduate, combat veteran, and former Under Secretary of the Treasury, McCormick has spent years in both public service and the private sector. However, his role as the CEO of Bridgewater Associates, a global hedge fund with billions under management, has now become a focal point of his political campaign. As he runs for a Senate seat in Pennsylvania, McCormick faces questions about his business decisions and whether they align with his current political promises.

Understanding Hedge Funds and Short Selling

To understand the controversy surrounding McCormick, it’s essential to grasp how hedge funds operate. Hedge funds pool capital from investors to make various types of investments, often involving complex strategies like short selling. Short selling is when an investor bets that a company’s stock price will decrease. While this can be a profitable strategy for investors, it can negatively impact the companies being shorted by driving down their stock prices, making it more difficult for them to grow, secure financing, or hire workers.

McCormick’s Tenure at Bridgewater Associates

McCormick joined Bridgewater Associates in 2009 and became co-CEO in 2017, eventually leading the firm solo in 2020 before stepping down in 2022. During his leadership, Bridgewater managed over $100 billion in assets, making it a behemoth in the financial world. Under McCormick’s guidance, Bridgewater employed sophisticated investment strategies, including shorting stocks of major companies, many of which were based in Pennsylvania.

Bridgewater’s Short Bets Against Pennsylvania Companies

Financial filings reveal that Bridgewater, under McCormick’s leadership, shorted stocks in nearly 50 Pennsylvania companies. The Hershey Company, US Steel, and Comcast were among the companies targeted. At one point, the firm shorted over $25 million worth of Hershey stock and over $16 million in US Steel shares. For Pennsylvanians working at these companies, such bets are seen as financial moves that undermine local jobs and industries.

The Impact of Short Selling on Companies

When hedge funds short a company’s stock, they essentially gamble on its failure. This can hurt a company’s stock price, affecting its ability to secure financing and grow its operations. For everyday workers, it could mean fewer jobs and reduced wages. In Pennsylvania, where many of the shorted companies play a crucial role in the state’s economy, these actions have left a sour taste in the mouths of voters.

Political Implications of McCormick’s Business Decisions

While McCormick’s business acumen might appeal to some voters, particularly those who appreciate his financial expertise, others see a disconnect between his campaign rhetoric and his business record. He has positioned himself as a job creator and advocate for Pennsylvania’s workers, yet his tenure at Bridgewater saw bets against the very companies that employ those workers. This political dichotomy is something his Democratic opponent, Bob Casey, has been keen to highlight.

Criticism from Pennsylvania Workers

Pennsylvania workers, especially those in industries affected by Bridgewater’s short selling, have voiced their concerns. Kevin Boltz, a long-time employee at Hershey, questioned whether McCormick truly understands the needs of everyday workers. Union leaders have also criticized McCormick’s hedge fund dealings, arguing that his actions at Bridgewater contradict his political promises.

McCormick’s Defense and Political Response

McCormick’s campaign has pushed back against these criticisms, arguing that his leadership at Bridgewater helped create financial returns for investors, including pension funds for teachers, firefighters, and police officers. His spokesperson, Elizabeth Gregory, contended that linking McCormick to specific investment decisions was unfair, comparing it to blaming a baseball manager for every pitch thrown during a game.

Bridgewater’s Broader Investment Strategies

It’s worth noting that Bridgewater didn’t only bet against Pennsylvania companies; the firm also invested in many of them. In fact, filings show that Bridgewater often had more money invested in these companies than it shorted. However, the optics of betting against local companies while campaigning as a job creator make for a complicated narrative.

The Role of Fiduciary Duty in McCormick’s Decisions

As the CEO of Bridgewater, McCormick had a fiduciary duty to maximize returns for his clients. This duty, however, doesn’t always align with the best interests of workers in companies that were shorted. While McCormick has accepted responsibility for the firm’s decisions, he has also stressed that the decisions were made with the firm’s clients in mind, not necessarily the broader economic landscape.

The Broader Political Landscape in Pennsylvania

The Pennsylvania Senate race is one of the most watched in the nation, with Republicans needing to flip just a few seats to regain control of the Senate. McCormick’s business background is a double-edged sword in this high-stakes race. While his financial expertise appeals to some voters, it also provides plenty of material for his opponents to attack.

Short Selling and Political Risk

Short selling may be a sound financial strategy, but it is politically risky. In the world of high finance, it makes sense to bet against overvalued stocks. However, when trying to win the hearts of voters, especially those directly impacted by such decisions, it can become a point of contention.

Public Perception of McCormick’s Business Record

How Pennsylvania voters perceive McCormick’s business record could be the deciding factor in this race. While his team has worked to highlight his accomplishments and downplay the impact of Bridgewater’s short selling, the reality is that these decisions are likely to be a focal point of debate.

Conclusion

Dave McCormick’s Senate candidacy is deeply intertwined with his past as a hedge fund CEO. While his financial expertise is undeniable, his tenure at Bridgewater and the firm’s bets against Pennsylvania companies present a significant political challenge. As the Senate race heats up, McCormick must navigate the difficult balance between his business record and his political aspirations.


FAQs

  1. What is short selling and why is it controversial?
    Short selling is when an investor bets that a company’s stock price will decrease. While it can be profitable, it can hurt companies by driving down their stock prices.
  2. How has McCormick’s business record affected his Senate race?
    McCormick’s tenure at Bridgewater, where the firm bet against Pennsylvania companies, has been a point of criticism, affecting his appeal to voters.
  3. What were some of the companies Bridgewater shorted under McCormick?
    Bridgewater shorted stocks in companies like Hershey, US Steel, and Comcast, all based in Pennsylvania.
  4. How do hedge funds impact everyday workers?
    Hedge fund strategies like short selling can negatively impact companies, leading to job losses or reduced wages for workers.
  5. What are the key issues in the Pennsylvania Senate race?
    The economy, job creation, and McCormick’s business record are key issues, as well as his opponent Bob Casey’s policies.